So now we are getting WoW without monthly fees = more little kids and less content than in WoW? I don't have anything against WoW, but to me the ideas behind GW were superior. WHO ARE YOU AND WHAT DID YOU DO TO MY HA- Nog64 Talk 18:02, 20 March 2007 (CDT) If I think of something else, I will add it. mini-expansions, and expansions are hinted at. I think I read somewhere in here that it will be mission-based, but I didn't see it in my quick second-look.Īs of now, there will be no monthly fees, and no 'campaigns'. Not using this feature lets you be mroe powerful. GvG will still be present, as a more balanced form where everyone is on a level playing field.Ĭompanions: NPC like heros can join you (like a pet it sounds), and dont count towards your party. At the end, the 'world' will be reset, and it will start again it seems. Big-ass raids that can supposedly take place for weeks on end. World vs World combat sounds to be a massive scale capture the flag (AB style?) with no minimum or maximum party size. you pick a 'world', but can switch between the realms. 'Click to move' will be abandonned in favor of a more freedom-rich control scheme, including 'jumping, swimming, and sliding' Sidekicks simlar to CoH, allowing powers to seep from a high level character to a friendly lower level char. I'll just take the level cap stuff directly - "Events will also offer a way for players of different levels to keep interacting in the persistent world - which is crucial, since right now, ArenaNet is planning a very high, or possibly no level cap" If the dragon isnt driven away, another 'quest' may trigger, leaving more options for the population. PCG gave an example of choosing to rally against a dragon or not. Hundreds of people in the same area, and choices that the population as a whole change the quest structure. Predominately open worlds, with Instancing as a secondary feature in some areas (not positive on the interpretation). → moved from Talk:Guild Wars Eye of the North Alreajk 19:11, 20 March 2007 (CDT) I suppose you could use the official wiki, so we don't end up with 2 separate ones. Besides, who said that Guild Wiki was only for Guild Wars 1? Guild Wars 2 is still a Guild Wars game in my book. I bet it will, or it will at least have a GW2 sister project.
Im wondering if this actually ends up to be a game, will the wiki cover it? Hoax 16:46, 13 March 2007 (CDT)
He said they are only trying to make the Guild Wars 2 base game available to all players. O'Brien added that players should not think that ArenaNet is planning to milk cash out of them. Guild Wars 2 will remain the same game it always has been." "We're not changing the way people purchase cosmetic items or adding a bunch of new items in the store. "So let's be clear that when we say Guild Wars 2 is buy-to-play, we're only asking you to buy one thing: the current release, Guild Wars 2: Heart of Thorns," Tech Times quotes ArenaNet's statement. In an interview with GameSpot, the firm's president Mike O'Brien explained that they will not alter the buying method for their customers, the Inquisitr reports. Unlike other MMOs that require a base price or monthly subscription payment, ArenaNet has chosen to let their customers pay a one-time charge. Players who want to venture beyond the base game have the option to purchase the expansions or level up their characters, according to Tech Times. Game developer ArenaNet has finally made the base game of "Guild Wars 2" free-to-play ahead of the release date of the "Heart of Thorns" expansion.įor ArenaNet, the Guild Wars 2 free-to-play scheme is the answer to the massively multiplayer online (MMO) role-playing game's lack of new players, despite it being around for several years. A screengrab from a promotional video for 'Guild Wars 2' free-to-play.
0 kommentar(er)
